Posts: 41
Registered: 2003-5-23 Location: CHILE..the end of the world.. Member is offline
Currently listening to: the livid, matchbox 20, default
posted on 2003-5-25 at 02:43
Do you think that grunge is dead?
Because i don't, i think that the grunge evolve, like everything and divide in certain bands that have grunge sound, and others that have
grunnge lyrics, what do you think?
Mat L
Recognised Member
Posts: 170
Registered: 2003-5-7 Location: MIssissauga Member is offline
Currently listening to: sublime
posted on 2003-5-25 at 03:40
i hate when people say that, ouh punks dead! its not dead as long as someone somewhere listens to it
Elisha Cuthbert owns you
Mark
Moderator
Posts: 970
Registered: 2003-4-16 Location: UK Member is offline
Currently listening to: james blunt
posted on 2003-5-25 at 08:55
I dont think grunge is a genre
I think its a era....
And, to answer your question.. I'm not sure. Putting Genres on bands today is most confusing
www.westpointrock.com
fooz_girl
New Member
Posts: 19
Registered: 2003-5-6 Member is offline
Currently listening to:
posted on 2003-5-25 at 19:05
quotation:Originally posted by Mark
I'm not sure. Putting Genres on bands today is most confusing
it is isnt it?! like emo-rock-gruge-punk-rap-pop grrr it anoys me, music is music!!
shiftyroach
Senior Member
Posts: 480
Registered: 2003-5-5 Location: Markhamania Member is offline
Currently listening to: Feist
posted on 2003-5-26 at 01:37
I think its a lot easier to group music into 2 genres...
1) good music
2) crap
can I find my faults // leave them and start // to find myself?
Hyde
Moderator
Posts: 792
Registered: 2003-5-4 Location: Surrey, UK Member is offline
Currently listening to: Mors Principium Est
posted on 2003-5-26 at 09:58
I wouldn't like to say, although I think there isn't many grunge bands about today (if by grunge you mean Nirvana,
singer's-voice-makes-you-want-to-kill-yourself type stuff).
Mark
Moderator
Posts: 970
Registered: 2003-4-16 Location: UK Member is offline
Currently listening to: james blunt
posted on 2003-5-26 at 13:27
quotation:Originally posted by shiftyroach
I think its a lot easier to group music into 2 genres...
1) good music
2) crap
Haha, True
www.westpointrock.com
Newbie4eva
Member
Posts: 58
Registered: 2003-5-10 Location: London Member is offline
Currently listening to: Taking back sunday
posted on 2003-5-26 at 20:13
it isn't but it should be well except pearl jam and soundgarden
shiftyroach
Senior Member
Posts: 480
Registered: 2003-5-5 Location: Markhamania Member is offline
Currently listening to: Feist
posted on 2003-5-26 at 21:13
Soundgarden still exists without Cornell?
can I find my faults // leave them and start // to find myself?
theo
Recognised Member
Posts: 178
Registered: 2003-5-11 Location: UK Member is offline
Currently listening to: eric gold/dire straites
posted on 2003-5-27 at 20:17
i think it's cool being able to define the type of music u listen to, but i tnk the industry needs to seriously sort out its problem of how to
define a band - u can put so many bands in so many different catagories...
Posts: 41
Registered: 2003-5-23 Location: CHILE..the end of the world.. Member is offline
Currently listening to: the livid, matchbox 20, default
posted on 2003-5-28 at 01:58
i'm very agree with the fact that today is amost impossible to to submit bands into genres. it's like when in the 90's the media say
rock alternative to name bands with suchs differences like soundgarden and collective soul. so maybe they go back to that.
chris barnard
New Member
Posts: 28
Registered: 2003-5-6 Location: somerset Member is offline
Currently listening to: poison the well
posted on 2003-5-28 at 19:56
of course its dead, like layne stacey and kurt cobain.
